While Heath and Leesman are no longer at risk of being taken by another club, several White Sox Minor Leaguers, including outfielder Jordan Danks and right-hander Terry Doyle, were left unprotected.
The press release says the 40-man roster is now at 36.
Another dumb move. Doyle had a very good season:
| Year | Age | Tm | Lg | Lev | Aff | W | L | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 25 | 2 Teams | 2 Lgs | AA-A+ | CHW | 8 | 10 | .444 | 3.07 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 173.0 | 162 | 65 | 59 | 11 | 33 | 0 | 122 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 703 | 1.127 | 8.4 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 3.70 |
| 2011 | 25 | Winston-Salem | CARL | A+ | CHW | 1 | 5 | .167 | 2.84 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 73.0 | 71 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 49 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 297 | 1.123 | 8.8 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 6.0 | 4.45 |
| 2011 | 25 | Birmingham | SOUL | AA | CHW | 7 | 5 | .583 | 3.24 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 91 | 38 | 36 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 73 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 406 | 1.130 | 8.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 6.6 | 3.32 |
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table Generated 11/18/2011.
And look at his 2011 AFL stats:
| 2011 Offseason Leagues | ||||||||||||||||||
| Team | League | W | L | ERA | G | GS | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | GO/AO | AVG |
| MSS | AFL | 4 | 0 | 1.98 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 1.20 | .135 |
Damn, what more did they want?
Also, inside you can see the Pitch F/X data for his starts in AFL stadiums that were Pitch F/X equipped. Average fastball was 92 mph. The guy threw strikes and didn’t walk batters. Why not give Doyle a shot to make the bullpen?
| Pitch Statistics | |||||||||
| Pitch Type | Avg Speed | Max Speed | Avg H-Break | Avg V-Break | Count | Strikes / % | Swinging Strikes / % | Linear Weights | Time to Plate |
| FA (Fastball) | 92.26 | 94.6 | -5.05 | 8.71 | 31 | 16 / 51.61% | 1 / 3.23% | 0.8224 | 0.406 |
| CH (Changeup) | 85.10 | 85.9 | -7.25 | 5.65 | 2 | 0 / 0.00% | 0 / 0.00% | 0.1004 | 0.443 |
| SL (Slider) | 82.85 | 84.2 | 0.68 | 1.02 | 8 | 8 / 100.00% | 2 / 25.00% | -0.9395 | 0.455 |
| CU (Curveball) | 80.03 | 80.9 | 4.15 | -7.34 | 10 | 9 / 90.00% | 1 / 10.00% | -0.5038 | 0.472 |
| Pitch classifications provided by the Gameday Algorithm and may be inaccurate.Pitch Type LWTS correspond to how many runs were likely to score on a particular pitch based on average run expectancy when each pitch was thrown and what happened as a result. Negative scores indicate more effective pitches.Time to Plate is the time, in seconds, that it takes an average pitch of this type to reach the plate. This is strongly correlated with velocity, but also factors in movement. | |||||||||
| Inning-by-Inning Pitch Totals | ||||||||
| Inning | Pitches in Inning | Strikes in Inning | Strike% in Inning | Cumulative Total Pitches | Pitch LWTS in Inning | |||
| 1 | 17 | 11 | 64.71 | 17 | 0.582 | |||
| 2 | 18 | 12 | 66.67 | 35 | -0.254 | |||
| 3 | 16 | 10 | 62.50 | 51 | -0.848 | |||
| Pitch Statistics | |||||||||
| Pitch Type | Avg Speed | Max Speed | Avg H-Break | Avg V-Break | Count | Strikes / % | Swinging Strikes / % | Linear Weights | Time to Plate |
| FA (Fastball) | 92.06 | 92.5 | -3.97 | 8.25 | 5 | 4 / 80.00% | 0 / 0.00% | 0.8192 | 0.403 |
| CH (Changeup) | 82.60 | 82.6 | -8.22 | 1.56 | 1 | 0 / 0.00% | 0 / 0.00% | 0.0613 | 0.451 |
| SL (Slider) | 82.10 | 83.3 | 2.19 | 0.30 | 3 | 2 / 66.67% | 0 / 0.00% | -0.0565 | 0.454 |
| CU (Curveball) | 80.34 | 83.1 | 2.72 | -3.95 | 5 | 3 / 60.00% | 1 / 20.00% | -0.9005 | 0.467 |
| Pitch classifications provided by the Gameday Algorithm and may be inaccurate.Pitch Type LWTS correspond to how many runs were likely to score on a particular pitch based on average run expectancy when each pitch was thrown and what happened as a result. Negative scores indicate more effective pitches.Time to Plate is the time, in seconds, that it takes an average pitch of this type to reach the plate. This is strongly correlated with velocity, but also factors in movement. | |||||||||
| Inning-by-Inning Pitch Totals | ||||||||
| Inning | Pitches in Inning | Strikes in Inning | Strike% in Inning | Cumulative Total Pitches | Pitch LWTS in Inning | |||
| 4 | 14 | 9 | 64.29 | 14 | -0.077 | |||
| Pitch Statistics | |||||||||
| Pitch Type | Avg Speed | Max Speed | Avg H-Break | Avg V-Break | Count | Strikes / % | Swinging Strikes / % | Linear Weights | Time to Plate |
| FA (Fastball) | 91.37 | 93.7 | -6.60 | 7.25 | 30 | 17 / 56.67% | 2 / 6.67% | -0.1210 | 0.408 |
| CH (Changeup) | 82.88 | 85.6 | -5.19 | 0.85 | 5 | 3 / 60.00% | 0 / 0.00% | -0.1477 | 0.450 |
| SL (Slider) | 81.97 | 82.4 | -1.80 | -0.51 | 3 | 2 / 66.67% | 1 / 33.33% | -0.0135 | 0.459 |
| CU (Curveball) | 80.07 | 81.1 | 1.26 | -7.33 | 7 | 5 / 71.43% | 1 / 14.29% | -0.4942 | 0.469 |
| FT (TwoSeam Fastball) | 90.19 | 91 | -10.32 | 5.78 | 7 | 5 / 71.43% | 0 / 0.00% | -0.4400 | 0.417 |
| Pitch classifications provided by the Gameday Algorithm and may be inaccurate.Pitch Type LWTS correspond to how many runs were likely to score on a particular pitch based on average run expectancy when each pitch was thrown and what happened as a result. Negative scores indicate more effective pitches.Time to Plate is the time, in seconds, that it takes an average pitch of this type to reach the plate. This is strongly correlated with velocity, but also factors in movement. | |||||||||
| Inning-by-Inning Pitch Totals | ||||||||
| Inning | Pitches in Inning | Strikes in Inning | Strike% in Inning | Cumulative Total Pitches | Pitch LWTS in Inning | |||
| 1 | 18 | 11 | 61.11 | 18 | -0.019 | |||
| 2 | 22 | 12 | 54.55 | 40 | -0.350 | |||
| 3 | 12 | 9 | 75.00 | 52 | -0.848 | |||
hi to all soxbronzetitan.wordpress.comers this is my first post and thought i would say a big hello to yous –
speak soon
g moore
Comment by garrymoore — November 24, 2011 @ November 24, 2011 6:38 pm |